Do we really need to add two more years in high school?
low quality of education VS. time consuming
- low quality of education
That just proves my point further: "most of the students finish their high school years without knowing anything". High school is an extremely under-stimulating environment.
- time consuming
It would be too time consuming. The quantity will not affect the quality.
- low quality of education
Adding two more years would be of great help to our students. The current student drop out ratio is due to low grades from either not being challenged enough or lack of interest in the current curriculum. In addition those that don’t move on to college find themselves in be lacking in knowledge and therefore have to take classes to catch up to the college curriculum. This provides for the idea of not just adding two years to high school but also moving some college level classes into high school. This would reduce the amount of money students would have to pay just to get caught up in their education.
- time consuming
i think it's not about how long a student studies...it's about how the teacher deliver each lesson and also the cooperation of the students...it does not mean that the longer you study the higher the quality of education...
for me, we should not add two more years for those who are intellectuals, people with brain, do they still need to add two more years to study ? and how can we add more years if we cannot afford to stand buildings for school children ?
ReplyDelete